NDI Report on October Local Municipal Elections
By Natalia Kochiashvili
Thursday, December 16
The NDI (National Democratic Institute of the United States) published the results of the monitoring of the local self-government elections in Georgia, which covered the period from September 1 to November 5.
The report notes that the already polarized political processes have been exacerbated by rude rhetoric and offensive statements, while the focus on national-level issues has overshadowed local-level needs. According to the NDI, the October 2021 local elections were held in the context of a long political stalemate created after the 2020 parliamentary elections.
“Developments, including the prospect of calling early parliamentary elections if the ruling party receives less than 43% of the vote, have increased political stakes for all parties. As groups of international observers noted, although the elections were competitive and generally well-administered, deep-seated shortcomings in the electoral environment negatively affected the process. As a result, the opportunity to reduce polarization and increase broad public confidence in the political process was missed.”
The NDI also speaks of the imbalance of party resources and the fact that despite increased transparency and improvements in the grievance process, the parties have expressed low confidence in the election administration.
“Georgian voters, election workers, and nonpartisan citizen election observers demonstrated their determination to ensure Georgia’s continued democratic progress. There were some improvements in electoral transparency, such as broadcasting CEC sessions and most interviews for nonpartisan DEC positions online, PEC level data in a more accessible format. However, the process was marred by widespread allegations of misuse of administrative resources, vote-buying, and pressure and intimidation of voters, candidates, and journalists.”
NDI says that the inclusion of women and minorities, as well as other underrepresented groups, in elections remains a challenge.
Even though gender quotas played a significant role in the large increase in women’s representation on proportional lists, very few women ran or were elected to majoritarian seats: the number of women majoritarians elected in 2021 is 37 (0.4%) - less than in 2014 elections.
A polarized and politicized media environment restricted the electorate from making informed decisions, attacks on the media and civil society in the first and second rounds of elections, and attempts to restrict their freedom of action have adversely affected the entire process. The responsibility for public skepticism is shared across the political spectrum as partisan gains appear to have been prioritized over the needs of the Georgian public.
“It is a political imperative that, in the period between elections, elected representatives fulfill their responsibility to represent the interests of voters.” said Alan Gillam, NDI Georgia Director, “Good faith efforts to work across the political divide and internal political reflection are required to ensure public confidence in the democratic political process ahead of the next electoral cycle.”
In the spirit of international cooperation, the NDI offers recommendations to Georgian stakeholders and stands ready to assist in their implementation:
- Political parties should carry out good faith efforts to work across the political divide and fulfill their responsibility to represent the interest of the voters to ensure public confidence in the democratic political process ahead of the next electoral cycle.
- Accountability measures should be implemented to ensure that authorities act impartially during the election period and prevent the misuse of administrative resources.
- A state entity should be responsible for systematically verifying all possible breaches of the rules of financing political campaigns, including potential illegal incomes, undeclared expenditures, and third-party spending. Analysis of financial reporting should also be conducted and available to the public on time.
- A broad and comprehensive review of the media regulations and practices during elections should be undertaken to address the challenges identified.
- Political parties should more actively engage the public between elections and through inclusive campaigns, structures to ensure platforms and issues are reflective of citizen concerns. They should develop their political programs around key public priorities and offer a clear position on how they would work to implement the solutions.
- Civic activism may fulfill its role only if it remains free from undue influence and pressure from political actors in the post-election period and throughout election cycles. All NGOs and media should pursue their activities with evidence-based methodologies, politically impartial analysis, robust engagement with authorities, and communication with the public.